Fresh and clean logo for a agricultural mechanisation company

Contest holder: pixelive
Category: Logo design
Status: Ended

GET A DESIGN

Start date: 17-01-2016

Ending date: 17-02-2016

Total budget: € 329.00

Latest design

R/A Designs

It all started with an idea...

A short, interactive guide helped them discover their design style and clearly captured what they needed.

Needs

Fresh and clean logo for a agricultural mechanisation company.

The logo is used for print and communication purposes, like:

Invoices, wall advertising, advertising, paper, envelopes, e-mails, website, printing etc..

Company name: Frans Piek
Subtitle: Landbouwmechanisatie (the dutch word for agricultural mechanisation company)

Keywords:

Mechanisation, reparation, sale, maintenance, agricultural machines, tractors, tractor tyres (tyre profile).

Company description

Frans Piek is a agricultural mechanisation company established in the Netherlands.
Doing activities like:

Reparation, maintenance and sale of mechanisation machines.

Target group

Colors, favourites and other requirements

We prefer the logo contains the color blue.

And we would prefer our subtitle (Landbouwmechanisatie) in the logo, but it is not a must.

designer: R/A Designs

rating:

300x300

designer: Axel Sonnet

rating:

300x300

designer: Axel Sonnet

rating:

300x300

designer: Axel Sonnet

rating:

300x300

designer: Axel Sonnet

rating:

300x300

designer: Axel Sonnet

rating:

300x300

designer: Axel Sonnet

rating:

designer: Mr. Love

rating:

designer: Mr. Love

rating:

designer: Blue Nights Design

rating:

designer: Blue Nights Design

rating:

designer: Blue Nights Design

rating:

designer: Mr. Love

rating:

designer: visiwerk

rating:

designer: niki

rating:

designer: visiwerk

rating:

designer: visiwerk

rating:

designer: Petje

rating:

designer: Petje

rating:

300x300

designer: logic4com

rating:

300x300

designer: logic4com

rating:

designer: ChrisGroot

rating:

300x300

designer: logic4com

rating:

designer: PunchingDesign

rating:

designer: Petje

rating:

designer: MDesign23

rating:

designer: mot

rating:

designer: update

rating:

designer: update

rating:

designer: mot

rating:

designer: sanjalu

rating:

designer: sanjalu

rating:

designer: sanjalu

rating:

designer: zarkovzi

rating:

designer: mot

rating:

designer: Makijaveli

rating:

designer: joosttilburg

rating:

designer: joosttilburg

rating:

designer: pepaljica

rating:

designer: pepaljica

rating:

designer: pepaljica

rating:

designer: krisi

rating:

designer: pepaljica

rating:

designer: pepaljica

rating:

designer: 2ND

rating:

designer: Designers Mind

rating:

designer: Berbakov

rating:

designer: Berbakov

rating:

designer: MDesign23

rating:

designer: joosttilburg

rating:

designer: MikesDesign

rating:

designer: joosttilburg

rating:

designer: joosttilburg

rating:

designer: stevan banjac

rating:

designer: stevan banjac

rating:

designer: VirtualLies

rating:

designer: stevan banjac

rating:

designer: MDesign23

rating:

designer: VandenHulDesign

rating:

designer: VandenHulDesign

rating:

designer: CORPnl

rating:

designer: CORPnl

rating:

designer: CORPnl

rating:

designer: CORPnl

rating:

designer: freebird

rating:

designer: Toobe.art

rating:

designer: Petje

rating:

designer: MDesign23

rating:

designer: MDesign23

rating:

designer: Toobe.art

rating:

designer: Toobe.art

rating:

designer: Y-graphic design

rating:

designer: Toobe.art

rating:

designer: Y-graphic design

rating:

designer: Y-graphic design

rating:

89 Submitted designs

30 Designers

0 Winner

With many strong entries submitted, the client faced a tough decision, but one design came out on top.